Previous
Benchmarks: Intel's 64-bit Pentium 4 660
Talkback The games benchmarks are obviously limited by the video card. They should have been done with 6800 Ultras, who's gonna buy a top of the line processor and a mainstream video card for gaming? Then, the Athlon 64 would have shown a much larger...
[March 5, 2005, 2:01]
Benchmarks: Intel's 64-bit Pentium 4 660
Talkback How about Linux benchmarks? Windows is pretty much obsolete nowadays. When I buy my next computer I want to know how fast it is before I make a purchase decision.
[March 5, 2005, 3:51]
Benchmarks: Intel's 64-bit Pentium 4 660
Talkback Why no Linux based benchmarks? bit linux has a significantly larger marketshare than 64 bit windows, and has far more 64 bit applications than Windows, so why was it not included as part of this review?
[March 4, 2005, 22:46]
Benchmarks Prove The Performance Of The Red Hat Linux Advanced Server Platform
White Papers This paper describes how recently announced database benchmarks demonstrate the performance of Red Hat Linux Advanced Server, Oracle9i Database with Real Application Clusters (RAC) running on HP ProLiant hardware.
[December 8, 2004, 23:00]
Benchmarks: Intel's 64-bit Pentium 4 660
Talkback That said, I'm a bit disappointed by the lack of 64-bit Linux benchmarks, considering x86_64 Linux has been out there for a long time and is probably a lot more mature that x86_64 Windows. While it's nice to see some competition in the 64-bit...
[March 5, 2005, 0:44]
AMD Releases Opteron Benchmarks
News AMD released prospective performance benchmarks for its upcoming server chip Opteron, and it appears the chip could land near the head of its class. Although the AMD benchmarks were produced in lab conditions, and Weber declined to elaborate on the...
[October 17, 2002, 7:31]
M-Switch X.400 Benchmarks
White Papers This paper gives performance benchmarks for Isode's M-Switch X.400, a high-performance X.400 Message Transfer Agent. The benchmarks re-enforce the belief that M-Switch X.400 is substantially faster than any other X.400 MTA.
[January 27, 2008, 23:00]
Characterizing Shared-Memory Applications: A Case Study Of The NAS Parallel Benchmarks
White Papers The objective of this report is to present our characterization of a shared-memory implementation of the NAS Parallel Benchmarks (NPB). This characterization is needed to support the design decisions of future shared-memory multiprocessors.
[May 6, 2004, 0:00]
AMD And Intel War Over Benchmarks
News The Intel benchmarks compare a Pentium 4 "Northwood" core with Rambus memory, for example, while the AMD core uses DDR (double data rate) DRAM, which does not allow the same bandwidth for memory-intensive applications such as video rendering, but...
[April 3, 2002, 14:07]
Processor Benchmarks: Intel Versus AMD
Talkback Which one won most benchmarks? Which one cost less? AMD Which one uses less power, saving you money? AMD AMD AMD = 3 for 3 Intel = 0 for 3 AMD = winner If you prefer to buy a processor because there marketing campaign is better than buy an Intel.
[December 21, 2004, 0:07]
Processor Benchmarks: Intel Versus AMD
Talkback Strange how you hide the benchmarks from view unless you click on the link. Could this be because if you check them out, they don't match the conclusion? From what I could see AMD won the MAJORITY of the tests, while Intel won a few.
[August 25, 2004, 12:58]
Intel Prescott: The Benchmarks
Talkback After further review, some of the benchmarks you performed are different enough from the "standard" that (when balanced with other reviews) helps to paint a better overall performance picture. re: Dual-Channel
[February 20, 2004, 4:55]
Benchmarks: Intel's 64-bit Pentium 4 660
Talkback And here, you have someone running benchmarks on a Windows (urk! Considering Microsoft's inability to provide a new OS which would be stable before the 4th or 5th revision (Win9x: Windows 98SE was 'stable' and following Win95, OSR1, OSR2, Win98...
[March 6, 2005, 22:52]
Benchmarks: Intel's 64-bit Pentium 4 660
Talkback How about an article about Intel's new 64-bit Pentium 4 660 and its performance for Linux applications with some benchmarks. Who cares about Windows anymore? Everyone is switching to Linux. I don't know any serious user who still uses Microsoft's...
[March 5, 2005, 3:42]
Performance Benchmarks For Passive UHF RFID Tags
White Papers These benchmarks give good indications as to how well RFID products will work in "Real world" scenarios. The paper presents benchmarks and gives some experimental results, as well as key insights that these benchmarks have revealed about the nature...
[May 10, 2006, 0:00]
Processor Benchmarks: Intel Versus AMD
Talkback Folks: A lower score is BETTER on SOME of theses benchmarks-hence the discrepency with the text/chip clock speeds.
[January 30, 2006, 14:22]
Connectivity, Collaboration, And Customization: New Benchmarks For The Future
White Papers These findings suggest new competitive leadership benchmarks for the next decade and different ways of driving new business processes for the first decade of the 21st Century. The new business alphabet requires a glossary to clarify and interpret...
[April 28, 2004, 0:00]
Attacks On Digital Watermarks: Classification, Estimation-based Attacks And Benchmarks
White Papers Benchmarks are used to evaluate the performance of different watermarking algorithms. Watermarking is a potential method for protection of ownership rights on digital audio, image and video data. For image watermarking, the Stirmark package is the...
[April 3, 2004, 0:00]
A Year Ago: Sun Accused Of Cheating Java Benchmarks
News Fresh from sending the lawyers in on Microsoft and accusing Bill Gates's men of breaking the Java JDK guidelines, Sun now stands accused of cheating Java benchmarks. The release also says: "The new Solaris record, 50 per cent faster than Windows NT...
[November 4, 1998, 6:04]
AMD Athlon 64: The Benchmarks
Talkback Why don't you get a copy of 64 bit Linux and run some 32 bit Pentium Extreme V 64 bit Athlon benchmarks to give a real idea of the performance difference. These are 32 bit bench marks.
[October 1, 2003, 12:54]
