Previous
Apple and chips
Talkback This article mentions DELL, the only 'Intel' PC vendor that still looks viable - again I say check out their margins. Interesting speculations, but I can't help wondering something: why does everybody assume that Apple wants to dominate the market?
[June 6, 2005, 14:10]
Apple and chips
Talkback I agree with the previous poster.Just because the Mac has an Intel cpu doesn't mean OSX et-all will run on a standard Dell. It does probably mean they will be able to pull the iTunes cross-platform move much more easily and when they want.
[June 6, 2005, 16:31]
Apple and chips
Leader A switch to Intel architecture creates a level playing field where those superiorities can be directly employed and Apple's suite of great consumer software - iLife, Garage Band, and the rest -- gets millions more potential customers.
[June 6, 2005, 12:40]
Will Intel chips make Macs less secure?
News When Apple announced in June 2005 that it would transition its Macintosh systems to Intel processors over the next couple of years, I can't say it was surprising. When Apple announced its plans to make the move to Intel, many industry pundits...
[March 1, 2006, 13:10]
Apple and chips
Talkback For example, an iPod which runs OS X remains unfeasibile unless you start to think in terms of low power-consumption intel chips. The Apple roadmap clearly envisages all sorts of non-PC devices running flavors of Darwin and/or OS X.
[June 7, 2005, 4:45]
Apple now world no 3 smartphone maker to make own chips for iPhone
Blog Well, it may allow them to differeniate from competitors who all buy chips from similar outlets like Samsung. It furthered confirmed it would not be using Intel's Atom processor in the next generation iPhone and iPods.
[November 7, 2008, 14:29]
Apple's new core: it's Intel inside
News The migration away from IBM's PowerPC chips will take two years, says Steve Jobs, as he admits that Apple has been working with Intel for years Apple and chips Apple makes the move to Intel From outrage to disbelief to approval, analysts, consumers...
[June 9, 2005, 16:05]
Coders unfazed by Apple's Intel move
News Apple developers aren't exactly looking forward to rewriting their applications to run on Intel chips, but the change will have its benefits. Macs will also likely get cheaper because Intel chips often cost less than IBM's.
[June 7, 2005, 9:55]
Intel Macs will struggle with Vista
News Apple announced last June that it would move the entire Mac product line to Intel-based chips. Windows now use Intel chips, the two operating systems have different ways of booting up. To this point, all of the Intel Macs have used 32-bit chips.
[March 10, 2006, 8:25]
Apple Mac OS on Intel? Maybe
News Apple Computer will likely shift to using Intel chips, while circumstances exist that could well push Dell Computer and Sun Microsystems into a friendly embrace, predicted Bear Stearns analyst Andrew Neff.
[August 5, 2002, 8:46]
Apple to ditch PowerPC for Intel processors
News Apple has used IBM's PowerPC processors since 1994, but will begin a phased transition to Intel's chips, sources familiar with the situation said. Apple plans to move lower-end computers such as the Mac Mini to Intel chips in mid-2006 and higher...
[June 6, 2005, 9:10]
Apple makes the move to Intel
News CEO Steve Jobs announced on Monday that Apple will gradually shift its Mac line to Intel-based chips over the next two years. In his speech, Jobs revealed that Apple has been developing all versions of OS X since its inception to run on Intel and...
[June 7, 2005, 9:40]
Shareholders take stock of Apple
News Apple chief executive Steve Jobs defended his company's environmental practices during the annual shareholder meeting, but also took time to reflect on market share and the Mac maker's transition to Intel chips.
[April 28, 2006, 11:20]
Intel deal threatens OS 9 support
News Apple Computer's move to Intel chips appears to spell the eventual end of support for older, pre-Mac OS X programs. Rosetta was announced by CEO Steve Jobs on Monday as the translation software technology that will help ease Apple's planned...
[June 7, 2005, 11:40]
Intel 'designing motherboard for Apple'
News This follows the surprise announcement earlier this summer that Apple is dropping IBM’s PowerPC processors in favour of Intel chips. The move to Intel chips has sparked speculation that Apple’s future products could lose some of their unique...
[December 29, 2005, 13:15]
Apple machine on display at IDF
News For a long time, people have suggested that Apple make its Mac OS X operating system work with Intel chips. Apple has resisted demands to move away from the PowerPC chips made by IBM and Freescale Semiconductor.
[March 4, 2005, 8:30]
Apple launches first Intel Macs
News The release of the new Macs comes just seven months after Jobs shocked the computer world with an announcement that Apple would move to Intel chips, after years of using the PowerPC hardware made by IBM and Motorola.Jobs said last June that Apple...
[January 11, 2006, 8:15]
Apple puts Leopard in limelight
News In addition to the Mac Pro, Apple also introduced its first Intel-based Xserve server, also sporting two dual-core Xeon chips. Apple didn't mention anything about new hardware with Intel's Core 2 Duo chips, which were unveiled a few weeks ago.
[August 8, 2006, 10:15]
Intel-powered Mac mini may be close
News Apple announced back in June 2005 that it would gradually shift its Mac line to Intel-based chips over a two year period. Jon Collins, principal analyst at Quocirca, said developing OS X to run on Intel chips could open up a whole new market and...
[November 9, 2005, 16:40]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback i=2436 This shows the G5 to perform in a very similar manner to comparable Intel and AMD chips. New Intel Apple macs (iBook, Powerbooks, iMacs, Mac minis etc.need* to support dual boot to Windows XP/Vista.
[November 11, 2005, 16:36]
