Unix Users Up In Arms At Bill Gates' Knighthood
Talkback Even assuming that dubious claim is true, a system is only as secure as its weakest link. And just in case you still think Linux is so secure, read this link: http://www.zdnetindia.com/techzone/stories/94133.html
[January 28, 2004, 11:40]
Unix Users Up In Arms At Bill Gates' Knighthood
Talkback The open source way bascially is no more secure, if not actualy LESS secure than closed source products. Bottom line : Despite constant boasts from the open source/linux crazies about how secure and bullet proof open source is, in practice it...
[January 30, 2004, 17:49]
Unix Users Up In Arms At Bill Gates' Knighthood
Talkback Less secure? http://www.openbsd.org/ One flaw in 7 years.ever heard of a windows firewall? Nope Bye for now
[January 31, 2004, 2:54]
Unix Users Up In Arms At Bill Gates' Knighthood
Talkback Bascule : "Less secure? One flaw in 7 years" Wrong again. Go to CERT and check their figures. According to CERT, Linux has had up to 3 times as many security break ins as Windows 2003. Now CERT is an independent body.
[January 31, 2004, 15:39]
Unix Users Up In Arms At Bill Gates' Knighthood
Talkback "Bascule : "Less secure? There's less chance you'll come off as a complete moron. One flaw in 7 years" Wrong again. Go to CERT and check their figures. According to CERT, Linux has had up to 3 times as many security break ins as Windows 2003.
[March 24, 2005, 5:08]
