Norton AntiVirus Definitions Update (i32 Package)
Downloads This definitions update is a complete replacement for any previous virus definitions set, and will work with the following Symantec products: NAV 2003 Professional Edition NAV 2003 for Windows 98/Me/2000/XP Home/XP Pro NAV 2004 Professional...
[August 6, 2008, 17:53]
Symantec Slams The Door On Live Update Flaw
Talkback For NAV/NIS 2004 and 2005, you can download a .REG file that when run removes most of the Registry entries left by add/remove. Sometimes you have to use special Symantec tools to completely remove Norton Antivirus and Norton Internet Security from...
[November 17, 2004, 17:41]
Does Anybody Like Norton AntiVirus?
Talkback Norton Internet Security 2005 = NAV + Norton Personal Firewall + more It's entirely possible that someday there will be some virus that NAV misses and someone else catches. NAV catches viruses in incoming e-mail all the time (fewer recently for...
[May 6, 2005, 16:25]
Norton AV Flaw May Put PCs At Risk Of Virus Attack
News Also notice that Auto-Protect doesn't kick in until you click on the tray icon and launch the NAV console. Symantec has admitted its flagship consumer security application, Norton AntiVirus 2005, has a security vulnerability that allows certain...
[November 9, 2004, 9:28]
The Future Of Fighting Viruses: A History And Analysis Of The Digital Immune System
White Papers Understanding the DIS has become salient now that Symantec has licensed, and incorporated, this technology into their enterprise level anti-virus software Norton AntiVirus (NAV). IBM's Digital Immune System (DIS) represents a logical step in...
[August 14, 2003, 16:19]
Norton AntiVirus: The Readers Strike Back
Talkback I find using google just as effective at solving problems with NAV as the symantec web site and don't even bother with the telephone support anymore. As someone who gets called out to small businesses to solve IT problems I keep at least one copy...
[March 26, 2004, 16:14]
Does Anybody Like Norton AntiVirus?
Talkback NAV have been working excellent for 3 years already on my computer and I didn't have any trouble. Anyway, the fact that this article exists says that NAV is completely successful and useful piece of software!
[November 30, 2004, 18:32]
Why You Should Ditch Norton AntiVirus
Talkback Purchased NAV 2006 in May 2006. In October I had a pc crash, which of course need NAV 2006 to be re-installed, and ativated. My recommendation would be get rid of NAV. Guess what, Symantec allow you to activate the product only 1 times.maybe two).
[October 15, 2006, 12:43]
Why You Should Ditch Norton AntiVirus
Talkback Read this article - http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/nav.nsf/docid/2001092114452606 Don't know how old this post is but if you're still looking for answers. In it, you'll find the info you need and if all else fails you can download an...
[August 15, 2005, 11:06]
Anti-virus Vendors Swap Jabs
News McAfee is demanding that Symantec withdraws its current NAV 2.0 package because the packaging claims 100 per cent protection against Word Macro viruses. McAfee goes on to claim that the "independent" authority cited by Symantec for its claims is...
[September 20, 1996, 16:22]
Does Anybody Like Norton AntiVirus?
Talkback Others do get stopped by NAV. I use norton systemworks 2003 for a year. Norton 2004 DOES have a problem. Symantec knows about it but they have done nothing to correct this fault. Most of viruses are stopped by my ISP, supanames.
[November 19, 2004, 10:37]
Why You Should Ditch Norton AntiVirus
Talkback Their recommendation to allow NAV to be installed correctly was to remove the virus, and their recommendation to remove the virus was to install NAV! Although Norton Anti Virus could apparently be installed, any attempt to run it resulted in the...
[November 12, 2004, 18:34]
Slows Browsing To A Crawl
Member Review The horror stories I've heard with Norton Utilities have made their way into NAV 2004 Pro. I've used NAV for years. I uninstalled NAV 2004 and now my browser won't work (although I can ping IP addresses).
[March 10, 2004, 18:05]
New NAV Offers One-click Anti-virus Update
News Norton AntiVirus 2.0 will list for £79 + VAT with upgrades at £29. Called LiveUpdate, the tool takes users straight to Symantec's Web site where the data is held. Symantec can be contacted by telephone on 01628-592320.
[August 21, 1996, 13:05]
On-line Help For Installation Problems Was Poor
Member Review After contacting NAV, online (Symantec) three times, they were not able to find a solution to the installation problems I encountered, even though I had satisfactorily installed 2003 and 2003 NAV.
[November 19, 2003, 10:23]
NAV 2004 Should Not Include Antispyware
Member Review NAV 2004 cannot detect and remove spywares like Gator, GMT and GAIN. Why does Symantec include this anti-spyware thing if it's not even an average performer. Symantec now pioneered another thing.that is PAY for SUPPORT and the SUPPORT people will...
[November 7, 2003, 14:06]
Had No Problems - Does Its Job Well
Member Review Then I checked out the reviews for NAV 2004 and found the same! I have been running NAV 2004 since Jan 2004 on AMD 2800+ with 512MB RAM and XP professional. On my previous PC, NAV 2002 would no longer automatically run Live Update, but worked if I...
[April 29, 2004, 12:33]
What Happened Symantec?
Member Review I am now looking for alternatives to NAV and NIS.I unfortunately bought the latest versions of both -- multiple copies too -- and am cursing it utterly. Both NIS and NAV get in the way of sending/receiving emails.
[March 17, 2004, 13:31]
Won't Scan For Infections
Member Review Purchased NAV 2004 on 23 Feb and have had problems trying to get it to scan. Tried all the fixes that Symantec told me to do, and have reinstalled eight times. System check online says all is up to date.
[March 2, 2004, 8:29]
People - Take A Computer Course!
Member Review This is a tools to PROTECT you, if it means sacrificing 5% CPU, so be it -- by the way that is the MOST your NAV should use! And, how about all the times Symantec's SSR group mails you out with removal tools.
[February 3, 2004, 10:44]

