Previous
3Com Banks On Open-source Strategy
News Networking giant 3Com is banking on an open-source strategy to differentiate itself from the competition. Despite this, Chai said 3Com is poised to further grow its market share by leveraging the OSN strategy to differentiate the company from its...
[August 16, 2007, 13:07]
Yahoo Talks Up Open Strategy
News At the Web 2.0 Expo in San Francisco, chief technology officer Ari Balogh says he's working on "rewiring Yahoo from the inside out" through a developer platform called "Yahoo Open Strategy". The goal of Yahoo Open Strategy is to help Yahoo's front...
[April 25, 2008, 12:37]
Microsoft Rejects IBM Strategy And Open Source 'dorks'
News IBM's on-demand model is "crazy" and Open Source is "really a developer phenomenon" that does not stand comparison with "customer experience of Windows Live", said Charles Fitzgerald, Microsoft's general manager of platform strategy, last week.
[November 15, 2005, 10:25]
Yahoo Introduces Open Strategy
News Unified user profiles and the effort to make it easier for users to share information with their friends is part of the company's broader "Yahoo Open Strategy", Balogh said. Right now you manage different bits of personal information in different...
[April 25, 2008, 9:59]
IBM Plans Open-source Storage Strategy
News IBM hopes its strategy will make Storage Tank widely used. To encourage the broadest possible support for its forthcoming "Storage Tank" technology, IBM will release an open-source version of the software needed to let servers tap into the next...
[December 23, 2002, 7:56]
Developing An Open Source Content Management Strategy For E-Government
White Papers The tools and guidelines presented will help web developers, information technology staff, and managers develop a CMS strategy and choose appropriate software for running e-government websites. This paper showcases five approaches to web content...
[August 23, 2005, 0:00]
Microsoft Rejects IBM Strategy And Open Source 'dorks'
Talkback Furthermore Open office doen't have the security holes that office does either. Yes! there can be no comparison with the live versions of office and Windows. I mean Linux doesn't have the security holes that Windows does due to it's architecture.
[November 16, 2005, 17:19]
Microsoft Rejects IBM Strategy And Open Source 'dorks'
Talkback Sales talk to convince people who have too much money anyway to see things as certain sales people would like to see things. However, ignorance is not an excuse for incompetance.
[November 17, 2005, 21:51]
Microsoft Rejects IBM Strategy And Open Source 'dorks'
Talkback Please - Google News beta works better than windows live - I can't get it to run on a windows machine - the strange thing is works on a linux box.
[November 26, 2005, 2:13]
Microsoft Rejects IBM Strategy And Open Source 'dorks'
Talkback m$ is a financial co presently trying to survive (in) the software industry. If it hadnt those B$$$ really wonder if it would survive one single year.
[November 26, 2005, 11:55]
Microsoft Rejects IBM Strategy And Open Source 'dorks'
Talkback Great words! I have no time for dorking with source code, leave it to entusiasts and give me reliable, ready-to-use products from the box!
[November 29, 2005, 20:29]
Microsoft Rejects IBM Strategy And Open Source 'dorks'
Talkback What Windows Live and Office Live mean is simply that you will need to buy new Microsoft software to make use of some special online Microsoft tools, and that you will need high-speed Internet access to make use of all those new softwares you bought.
[November 16, 2005, 15:07]
Microsoft Rejects IBM Strategy And Open Source 'dorks'
Talkback Open source can be an advantage even to end users. Users of similar software that is open source do not have that fear of abandonment. The fact that a program's source code is available for virtually anyone to hack on can give software a longer...
[November 15, 2005, 19:18]
Microsoft Rejects IBM Strategy And Open Source 'dorks'
Talkback Just anouther propaganda techniqe. Just because you can have a programmer customise a part of a program to better suite your needs doesn't mean that you have to. Today, one doesn't have to compile anything.
[November 15, 2005, 17:28]
Microsoft Rejects IBM Strategy And Open Source 'dorks'
Talkback Reminds me of the gibberish talked in a noisy pub after work on a Friday when everyone is well oiled. Name calling is about all they can muster when FUD fails. I doubt this Microsoft person has ever seen a mainframe, let alone understand one.
[November 15, 2005, 16:13]
Microsoft Rejects IBM Strategy And Open Source 'dorks'
Talkback Oh PLEASE spare us another Microshaft user eXPerence. Gee these dodos can't even update their sales talk. They are still talking about the "user expereince" -- the exact same B$ they told us when they rolled out XP.
[November 15, 2005, 15:05]
Microsoft Rejects IBM Strategy And Open Source 'dorks'
Talkback Sounds like the guy has a screw loose, he definitely doesn't seem to have a clue about what the competition is doing, and it doesn't sound like he has looked at any open source offerings in the last 10 years.
[November 15, 2005, 13:02]
Microsoft Rejects IBM Strategy And Open Source 'dorks'
Talkback Open Source software is very usefull Bullshit!
[December 9, 2005, 7:34]
Microsoft Rejects IBM Strategy And Open Source 'dorks'
Talkback Who wants to be in the pants of a jige of t first instance: Business as usual.
[November 30, 2005, 21:10]
Microsoft Rejects IBM Strategy And Open Source 'dorks'
Talkback More FUD from M$. The only future they see is windows through rose colored glasses.
[November 15, 2005, 12:33]
