Previous
Red Hat sues SCO over Linux
News Red Hat escalated the legal war over Linux on Monday by announcing that it has filed a lawsuit against the SCO Group. The seven-count suit seeks, among other things, a declaratory judgment that Red Hat has not violated SCO's copyrights or trade...
[August 5, 2003, 9:00]
Red Hat demands action on SCO case
News Red Hat has asked a federal judge to reverse her decision to put its copyright-related lawsuit against the SCO Group on hold. That move came six months after Red Hat launched its legal bid to protect itself against SCO copyright claims.
[April 21, 2004, 9:15]
Red Hat must wait for SCO ruling
Talkback Quite how SCO thinks that IBM have been untimely is baffling me. If you look at http://www.groklaw.net you'll see that it is SCO that have delayed, ignored court orders and generally not shown everything that they have been ordered to do.
[April 8, 2004, 14:06]
Red Hat must wait for SCO ruling
Talkback There is lot more substance there than in any of SCO's allegations. Is the DOJ partiality to M$ being displayed here again, now that the MS/SCO link is established ? I still can't understand how a company can make such unsubstantiated statements...
[April 8, 2004, 17:25]
Red Hat must wait for SCO ruling
Talkback Further, Novell's motion to dismiss SCOG's suit against Novell will probably be granted within a month, and possibly on grounds that SCOG did not provide evidence that Novell transferred any copyrights to old SCO.
[April 11, 2004, 22:34]
Red Hat must wait for SCO ruling
News In a mixed ruling on Tuesday, a federal judge has denied SCO's motion to throw out a suit brought by Linux seller Red Hat but has put the case on hold, awaiting an outcome in a related case between IBM and SCO.
[April 8, 2004, 11:50]
Red Hat has 'no grounds' for lawsuit, says SCO
Talkback Yawwwn. Let the games begin. I am getting tired of this posturing game. From street-level I get the impression that software companies have traded vapour-ware for hotair-ware. This can't be doing anyone any good.
[September 16, 2003, 13:09]
Red Hat has 'no grounds' for lawsuit, says SCO
Talkback Well, it seems the only way any zdnet outlet is going to cover THIS story is to inject it into comments about related stories. Ordinary, everyday users of linux have put together their own response to Darl's "Open Letter" at : http://www.groklaw...
[September 24, 2003, 11:59]
Red Hat hires IBM lawyer to fight SCO
News Linux seller Red Hat, tangled in a legal wrestling match with the SCO Group, has hired a new top lawyer from IBM. Red Hat sued SCO in August, seeking a declaration that its Linux products don't infringe SCO's copyrights or trade secrets.
[May 18, 2004, 9:15]
Red Hat CEO calls for end to 'rumours and innuendo'
News After weeks of Linux-baiting, the folks at SCO Group finally managed to light Red Hat CEO Matthew Szulik's famously short fuse. On Monday, Red Hat slapped SCO with a seven-count lawsuit that Szulik said was designed to head off a "campaign of...
[August 8, 2003, 10:15]
Red Hat has 'no grounds' for lawsuit, says SCO
News Controversial software seller SCO Group fired back against Linux leader Red Hat on Monday, filing a motion to dismiss the Linux company's suit against SCO. In a motion filed late on Monday in US District Court in Delaware, SCO argues that Red Hat...
[September 16, 2003, 9:00]
SCO sets steep charge for Linux licence
News Software maker SCO Group fired back at Linux leader Red Hat on Tuesday and revealed steep licensing prices for Linux users who want to steer clear of the company's legal wrangle with the open-source operating system.
[August 6, 2003, 9:10]
Sun, HP say SCO's claim is not relevant
News Sun Microsystems and Hewlett-Packard say SCO Group's attempt to obtain royalties for inappropriate uses of Unix isn't likely to affect them, while Linux specialist Red Hat said it would defend itself vigorously against any challenges.
[May 20, 2003, 13:16]
SuSE: SCO's anti-Linux attacks are 'curious'
News In the mean time, Linux vendors MandrakeSoft and Red Hat said they had not been contacted about SCO's allegations and did not see them affecting business. Red Hat, by far the largest Linux vendor, said it had not had any conversations with SCO...
[May 15, 2003, 13:46]
Another Linux firm indemnifies against SCO
News In response to the SCO Group's legal action against Linux, Red Hat is offering new legal protection that guarantees the company will replace any code found to infringe copyrights. SCO alleges that IBM improperly moved Unix intellectual property...
[January 20, 2004, 7:45]
Intellectual property battles will wound Linux
News As the battle escalates with SCO upping the ante -- seeking more than $3bn (£1.78bn) in damages for alleged copying of proprietary Unix intellectual property into Linux -- deep throats in the IX biz (Unix, Linux) are talking and, as reported...
[June 18, 2003, 16:05]
Red Hat: There's still room for improvement
News While SCO has suffered its share of setbacks, Red Hat is cashing in on tens of thousands of new subscriptions for Red Hat Enterprise Linux. The company, which is the top Linux seller, appears to have emerged unscathed by the campaign waged by the...
[August 5, 2004, 17:45]
Industry group fights SCO with Linux education
News Claims such as these led Linux vendor Red Hat to countersue SCO in order to lay the matter to rest. The Open Source Development Labs (OSDL), a Linux consortium funded by most of the computing industry's major companies, has launched the open-source...
[November 27, 2003, 13:05]
SuSE feels safe despite SCO legal threat
News Asked if SCO planned legal action against Red Hat and SuSE, SCO chief executive Darl McBride told CNET News.com, "There's a point in time that has to be resolved with those guys, too. Red Hat, the top seller of Linux, said its efforts to make sure...
[May 6, 2003, 11:26]
SCO may target more hardware makers
News SCO may also amend its complaint to bring additional causes of action against IBM, he added, and bring subsequent actions against Linux software developers such as Red Hat and SuSE. A Red Hat representative said that the company has not been...
[June 16, 2003, 8:28]
