MP Welcomes UN Indecision On Internet Policy
Talkback I believe that the main premise of this article is incorrect - the WGIG did agree - to provide multiple options to the negotiating body. The WGIG is NOT the UN. There is no "status quo" option in the WGIG report.
[July 19, 2005, 15:10]
Public 'left Out' As Governments Plot Internet Regulation
News To this end, the UN has set up the Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG) to spend 12 months consulting and reporting on the way ahead. According to Dyson, WGIG is not the right way to address the problems facing the Internet.
[September 24, 2004, 16:45]
Public 'left Out' As Governments Plot Internet Regulation
Talkback I believe that ICANN is for IPv4, and WGIG-- more precisely ITU--is for IPv6. Is the Internet going to be another Tower Of Babel?
[September 24, 2004, 18:26]
Internet Governance - Unpalatable, But Necessary
Leader This group has just begun a 12-month global fact-finding and consultation process -- which was likened to a flying circus last week by WGIG leader Marcus Kummer. Kummer gave a taste of the WGIG's ambitions last week at London's Royal Society.
[September 27, 2004, 14:00]
