Previous
SCO Sets Up Linux-licence Shop
Talkback The SCO Group is effectively scamming Linux Users with a variation of the "Data Protection Scam" http://www.google.com/search? The SCO Group is effectively scamming Linux Users with a variation of the "Data Protection Scam" http://www.google.com...
[February 24, 2004, 8:05]
SCO To Attack Validity Of Linux Licence
Talkback Q&A document, written by Lawrence Rosen, noted technology legal expert, designed to help Linux users better understand the implications of the current SCO litigation.http://www.osdl.org/docs/qa_re_sco_vs_ibm.pdf
[August 15, 2003, 15:24]
Linux Lawsuit Raises Questions For Customers
Talkback SCO doesn't even own the copyright on the unix code it is claiming IBM has used.http://www.novell.com/news/press/archive/2003/05/pr03033.html SCO reply to the above http://ir.sco.com/ReleaseDetail.cfm?
[November 24, 2003, 22:47]
Attackers Take Down SCO Site Again
Talkback site=www.sco.com Notice SCO just up and disappears. Maybe you guys at zdnet could check netcraft next time SCO claims to have been DOSed. Take a look at this link: http://uptime.netcraft.com/perf/graph?
[December 11, 2003, 20:36]
Attackers Take Down SCO Site Again
Talkback SCO's claim of a DDoS attack, noting that while the site www.sco.com is inaccessible, ftp.sco.com is responsive. Security Expert Doubts SCO's Attack Story", Some serious questions have been raised about
[December 11, 2003, 8:38]
Unix Decline Extends SCO Revenue Drop
Talkback You also wrote: "SCO .claimed a minor victory [over] AutoZone .using Linux. id=2660: "SCO over the first six months of this fiscal year the company has spent $1 million less on R&D and nearly $4million less on sales and marketing.
[June 2, 2005, 19:06]
SCO: IBM Has 'failed To Comply'
Talkback It's silly of you to print SCO press releases, and especially silly to print extracts from their court filings, without looking at www.groklaw.net to see what's really going on. For example, in this filing, SCO is claiming that IBM has failed to...
[July 13, 2004, 18:38]
SCO Target Asks For Suit To Be Dismissed
Talkback DaimlerChrysler argues that although it has no obligation to provide SCO with the certification, it has indeed done so. DaimlerChrysler has provided SCO with the only certification required under the license demonstrating that DaimlerChrysler is...
[April 30, 2004, 16:38]
Virus Variants Spread
News MyDoom.F is the latest variant of the virus that launched a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack against the SCO Web site early this month. The latest variant launches a DDoS attack against both www.microsoft.com and www.riaa.com if the...
[February 26, 2004, 7:40]
Attackers Take Down SCO Site Again
Talkback Either they're incompetent and can't tell a different DoS attack (keep in mind that most of the other attacks happen to be bandwith sapping attacks and therefore one would not be able to access adjacent hosts- ftp.sco.com IS accessable.or they're...
[December 11, 2003, 15:57]
SCO And Linux: The Legal Rights And Wrongs
Talkback The offhand comment "some offhand comment about it not being serious" is quite insulting to the people at www.groklaw.com, who have collected very serious arguments why, in fact, SCO's claimas are almost certainly without any merit at all.
[September 30, 2003, 17:15]
SCO Brings Linux Licensing To Europe
Talkback If SCO sue somebody, they will: have to show the code that they have refused to show (which the OS community will then remove).prove that they own the copyrights which Novell is disputing. SCO has been threatening to sue for months but has not.
[January 14, 2004, 12:25]
Trolltech Gets Funding Boost
Talkback The completion of this investment round precipitates the departure of Borland, Canopy Group and SCO Group from Trolltech's ownership structure.quote from below link) No more Canopy/SCO connection for QT!
[May 24, 2005, 21:13]
SCO Opens New Legal Front Against Novell
Talkback From the link below.http://www.novell.com/licensing/indemnity/pdf/5_28_03_n-sco.pdf If SCO claims to own the copyrights then why did they beg Novell to transfer it to them ? We believe it unlikely that SCO can demonstrate that it has any ownership...
[January 21, 2004, 11:06]
SCO Linux Lawsuits Could Hit Users This Year
Talkback SCO's lawsuit against Linux users do have merit. Here is an article from LinuxWorld dated 8-2003, about a company called Aduva that created a program to eliminate SCO coding from Linux distributions. If there were no codes copied from System V Unix...
[January 2, 2004, 14:19]
Caldera To Release Project 42 Public Beta
News Last year the company acquired the longstanding Unix vendor SCO. Because it supports Unix and Samba file and print servers, Project 42 can run either alone or on top of [the former SCO operating system] UnixWare," said Caldera in a statement.
[March 14, 2001, 14:41]
Truth Or Dare
Talkback Mind you, not being that technical, I did think that SCO's assertions had been roundly debunked. I do not believe that our friends in Redmond have given up the war of attrition on Linux and there is a very plausible article in the pick of latest...
[May 6, 2008, 12:57]
Attack Downs Yahoo, Google And Microsoft
News Earlier in the year, the main Web site of the SCO Group was crippled after attacks from computers infected by the MyDoom virus. During the outage, Song noticed that sites such as Google were still functional, but someone typing www.google.com...
[June 16, 2004, 8:35]
SCO Cancels Sequent's Unix Licence
Talkback The web site www.sequent.com redirects to www.ibm.com. There isn't any "IBM subsidiary Sequent". IBM bought them and they're integrated into the company. This would explain why you weren't able to contact Sequent representatives for comment.
[August 13, 2003, 23:19]
SCO Takes Softly, Softly Approach Downunder
Talkback Check www.groklaw.com for details. OZ Anti-fraud laws make SCOs case impractical. I wish ZDnet would do some research
[January 20, 2004, 11:12]
