ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Jobs
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


Compliance Toolkit

Burst.com faces off with Microsoft

Munir Kotadia ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 04 Sep 2003 12:40 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Microsoft is being sued by US software developer Burst.com for allegedly stealing patented media transmission technology and using it in Media Player 9. Although Microsoft denies the allegation, the Redmond giant was told by a judge last week to search through back-up tapes and produce any emails that relate to dealings with its former partner.

Richard Lang, founder and chief executive of Burst.com, claims his company grew from nothing into a $200m (£127m) business with hundreds of staff over a period of ten years, and then almost imploded during the dot-com downturn. Burst.com is still trading, but Lang is one of only two full time employees left and is now facing a legal battle with one of the wealthiest and most powerful companies in the world.

Q: What is the concept behind your transmission technology?
We had a vision in 1987 of a delivery mechanism -- a way of distributing audio and video over electronic networks. In 1988, we launched the company as a partnership, and by 1990, we were an official corporation and had received £2m in VC investment.

Prior to our technology, the approach to distributing video and audio was the broadcast model -- where you have a television or cable station that simply plays audio or video in real time. This means that if it was a 30 minute programme, it took 30 minutes for that programme to be delivered and 30 minutes to watch it.

By using a number of different components -- including digital compression and storage -- we designed a system that could deliver video in chunks. It would send anything from a couple of minutes worth of video, an entire two-hour programme or anything in between at a very rapid rate. The information would be stored wherever the viewer was and would require either a set top box or a PC.

Q: When did Microsoft get involved?
We spent the following seven years building a portfolio containing 37 patents, nine of which were filed in the US. The balance were in countries including the UK, Japan, Korea, India and Australia.

Next

Previous

1 2 3


  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with Konica

Did you find this article useful?
150 out of 344 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:












Loading Video Player ....

Featured Talkback

In association with Intel
There will be further activation issues to watch out for as Microsoft plans to offer a similar service to independent software vendors whereby they can "control" licensing through activation and other measures similar to the Software Protection Platform.

By: DefenceIT

Read full story:
Microsoft outage down to 'human error'

Sentry Posts Blog

The Technological Singularity

Are we approaching a point when machines may wake up and become self or seemingly self aware? Vernor Vinge in 1993 seemed to think so. He refered to this event as the "technological... More

2 comments

Mobile Operating Systems: MOPS At a Gl...

Mobile Operating Systems: At a Glance Author: Eric Everson, Founder MyMobiSafe Since posting my blog exposing the security Google G1 security issue, I have received a few emails... More

Post a comment

Met Police catch test cheats

I saw the funny side of this press release, I can just imagine the two people sitting in the car giving the answers to the questions. Why they had wires running from under the bonnet... More

Post a comment