ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Jobs
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


Industry watch Toolkit

Court: Itanium infringes patents

Ian Fried and Michael Kanellos, CNET News.com CNET News.com

Published: 11 Oct 2002 07:40 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

A federal court ruled on Thursday that Intel's Itanium processor violates patents owned by Intergraph and ordered Intel to pay $150m (£96m) in damages.

The ruling is the culmination of the trial phase of a bitter, multi-issue dispute, dating back to 1997. Huntsville, Alabama-based Intergraph, once a close ally of Intel's in the workstation market, alleged that Itanium, an Intel chip for servers, infringed on designs embodied in two Intergraph patents and in its Clipper processor, a microchip formerly used in Intergraph's workstations.

Years ago, a court threw out antitrust complaints filed by Intergraph, and this past April, Intel agreed to pay $300m to settle claims that its Pentium lines of chips infringed on Intergraph patents.

As part of that settlement, the two companies agreed to limit damages in this final phase to $150m. If Intel appeals the ruling and loses, Intel will pay Intergraph another $100m.

Intel spokesman Chuck Mulloy said the ruling will not become final for 10 days and the company will ask the judge to reconsider his decision. "Clearly we are disappointed, and we respectfully disagree with the judge's ruling," Mulloy said.

If the judge does not reconsider, Mulloy said, Intel plans to appeal, despite the potential $100m penalty. If Intel were to win an appeal, it would not get the $150m back, but it would free of having to pay Intergraph a licence fee on future Itanium chips.

Currently, Intergraph says that for $100m more, Intel can obtain a licence to the disputed patents. Intergraph also says that Intel could redesign its chips, which is probably impractical.

"This ruling validates Intergraph's patents, and paves the way for Intergraph's Intellectual Property (IP) Division to actively pursue open licensing with others throughout the consumer-electronics and computer industries," said Intergraph chairman and chief executive Jim Taylor in a statement. "We are pleased that the company's long-standing dispute with Intel has concluded with yet another significant return from the company's investment in innovation."

Intergraph is also alleging that other companies have infringed on the same patents. The company entered into a licensing agreement with Fujitsu over the patents a few weeks ago, said Intergraph general counsel David Vance Lucas.

"It certainly establishes the legitimacy and value of our patent portfolio," Lucas said in an interview.


See Chips Central for the latest headlines on processors and semiconductors.

To find out more about the computers and hardware that these chips are being used in, see ZDNet UK's Hardware News Section.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the Chips Central Forum.

Let the Chips Central editor know what you think by email. And sign up for the weekly Chips Central newsletter.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with Konica

Did you find this article useful?
19 out of 37 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Discussions

lumension lumension

What do I need to consider in managing...

Wednesday 19 November 2008, 8:11 AM

1 comment
lumension lumension

Great to have the patches but which of...

Wednesday 19 November 2008, 7:57 AM

1 comment
lumension lumension

Eliminate Malware by Controlling Appli...

Wednesday 19 November 2008, 7:45 AM

1 comment
gogotradeb2c gogotradeb2c

wholesale ugg boots,nike,adidas,gucci,...

Wednesday 19 November 2008, 2:09 AM

1 post

Featured Talkback

In association with Intel
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal