ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Jobs
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


Office applications Toolkit

J.D.Edwards customers keen on PeopleSoft

Matt Hines CNET News.com

Published: 06 Jan 2004 12:35 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

PeopleSoft is earning guarded praise from customers of its latest acquisition, former rival J.D. Edwards.

A survey that IDC released on Monday showed that more than 80 percent of J.D. Edwards software users retain a positive view of PeopleSoft and the manner in which the company handled the merger. Only 9 percent of respondents to the survey said they harbour a less favourable view of the combined vendor. However, the report said 69 percent of former J.D. Edwards customers have no immediate plans to buy new software from PeopleSoft.

Albert Pang, an analyst at IDC, said PeopleSoft executives have as much to worry about as they have reason to celebrate. He said that along with continued sluggishness in the enterprise software market, the company must address concerns regarding how it plans to move forward.

"From a customer support level, PeopleSoft has done an outstanding job in creating a sense of security for J.D. Edwards customers," Pang said. "What it boils down to is the fact that it will take more time for PeopleSoft to integrate the companies' products and convince customers they need to reinvest."

PeopleSoft did not immediately return calls seeking comment on the study.

Before PeopleSoft's $1.7bn (£0.94bn) buyout of J.D. Edwards in August, both enterprise software makers built business applications catering to functions such as customer relationship management, financials and supply chain management. In December, PeopleSoft released a set of integration tools aimed at linking the acquired company's software with its own package of business software applications.

Pang said there are some concerns regarding how much PeopleSoft plans to alter service prices for J.D. Edwards products. The company already raised its service fees by roughly 5 percent, making some end users unhappy and causing them to question what additional value is being delivered along with the higher prices.

PeopleSoft also must address some of the weaker aspects of J.D. Edwards software, he said. For instance, some customers were not happy with the company's scheduling tools, and it may take a while for PeopleSoft to convince them that an integrated version of the software can work more smoothly. Pang said such product issues are potential "hidden surprises" for PeopleSoft in moving past the merger and building new tools.

However, he continues to view the deal as a positive move for PeopleSoft, he said, adding that one of the biggest obstacles to new software sales may be the overall quality of J.D. Edwards' existing products. The analyst said it became clear during his research that many J.D. Edwards customers are happy with the levels of return on investment from the applications they already own.

"Customers are looking at the fact that they may have five more years to amortise the costs of existing investments, so PeopleSoft will truly have to raise the bar in order to convince users to spend more money sooner," Pang said.

Pang added that he does not believe that there is a great amount of concern left among customers over Oracle's hostile bid to take over PeopleSoft, but he indicated that the company's management will need to think about how it can successfully handle overtures from Oracle and other potential suitors in the future.

"With more than 10,000 customers under one roof, you can be sure competitors will continue to view the combined company as a potential opportunity," he said.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with Konica

Did you find this article useful?
23 out of 49 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Featured Talkback

In association with Intel
Why do so many (virtually all) software packages think that they are so important that they have to be started automatically every time the computer boots? What is the largest number of "speed access", "update check", "camera download" and whatever other background programs you have ever seen running? Of those, how many did you really need?

By: J.A. Watson

Read full story:
Annoying software: a rogues' gallery

Discussions

lumension lumension

What do I need to consider in managing...

Wednesday 19 November 2008, 8:11 AM

1 comment
lumension lumension

Great to have the patches but which of...

Wednesday 19 November 2008, 7:57 AM

1 comment
lumension lumension

Eliminate Malware by Controlling Appli...

Wednesday 19 November 2008, 7:45 AM

1 comment
jingletruck jingletruck

Dont be Evil

Tuesday 18 November 2008, 10:00 PM

1 comment

Vista Upgrade Blog

Wireless Networking - Linksys WRT350N...

Ok, this is driving me crazy. Why does this not work? I have a Linksys WRT350N Wireless-N router, and a laptop with an Intel 4965AGN Wireless Network Interface. When I am running... More

5 comments

Software Jihad part 2

I guess the point of my previous post (read rant if you want) was that Microsoft makes a lot of noise of "protecting" their IP but in reality they are only paying lip-service to it... More

3 comments

Software Jihad

I've been reading an article/blog over at CNN talking about the Chinese lawyer that has filed suit on Microsoft for putting black desktop backgrounds every hour on pirated copies of... More

2 comments